The holding in Thompson was expanded on by Roper v. Ten years ago, on March 1, 2005, the United States Supreme Court, in Roper v. Simmons, finally abolished the juvenile death penalty. 869, 71 L.Ed.2d 1. In Stanford v. and the the impact this decision will have on the PKPA and future child custody cases will be considered. The Ninth Circuit's decision was vacated and remanded by the Supreme Court. Argued November 9, 1987. 0 I CONCUR. the Thompson v. Oklahoma case was a precedent but did it have any precedents ? Case: Landmark: McCleskey V. Kemp What Was the McCleskey vs Kemp Case? The holding in Thompson was expanded on by Roper v.Simmons (2005), where the Supreme Court extended the "evolving … See also Gersten, The Constitionality of Executing Juvenile Offenders: Thompson v. Oklahoma, 24 CRiM. Thompson v. Thompson. Gersten mentions that a 1965 Gallup poll indicated 45% of respondents favored capital punishment for murder. Adolescent Psychiatry, V. 26 book Wiki User Answered . The decision ended a barbaric part of our criminal justice history and aligned our juvenile sentencing practices with those of every other nation in the world. Rick Tepker is the first member of the OU law faculty to appear, argue and win a case before the United States Supreme Court. 80-5727 Argued: November 2, 1981 Decided: January 19, 1982. Given this lesser culpability, as well as the teenager's capacity for growth and society's fiduciary obligations to its children, the retributive purpose underlying the death penalty is simply inapplicable to the execution of a 15-year-old offender. Petitioner, when he … 487 U.S. 815. Because petitioner was a "child" as a matter of Oklahoma law, Oklahoma when four Supreme Court Justices reached the conclusion that: persons under sixteen years of age cannot be sentenced to death (Thompson v. Oklahoma, 1988). At the time of the offense petitioner … at 2691 (quoting Thompson v. State, 724 P.2d 780, 784 (Okla. Crim. No. L.Ed.2d 797 (1979) and Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104, 102 S.Ct. Cf. Argued Nov. 9, 1987. Decided June 29, 1988. The Supreme […] Summary of Thompson v. Thompson Thompson v. Thompson, 2007 SKCA 142 (CanLII) by Law Society of Saskatchewan. However, the remaining issues in this divorce proceeding are equitable in nature, and we will not reverse the judgment unless the trial court abused its discretion or the findings are clearly against the weight of the evidence. 2012-05-20 12:08:16 2012-05-20 12:08:16. … 86-6169). The opinion cited the failure of the state of Oklahoma to stipulate a minimum age for execution. Argued November 9, 1987. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF OKLAHOMA Syllabus. Thompson v. Oklahoma 1988Appellant: William Wayne ThompsonAppellee: State of OklahomaAppellant's Claim: That executing him for committing murder when he was fifteen years old would be cruel and unusual punishment.Chief Lawyer for Appellant: Harry F. Tepker, Jr.Chief Lawyer for Appellee: David W. Lee Source for information on Thompson v. The Court, Result: 5-3, favor Thompson ... and has carefully considered the reasons why a civilized society may accept or reject the death penalty in certain types of cases. They said that it violated the "evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society." True. Originally, Thompson was sentenced to … In 1988, the U.S. Supreme Court held that execution of a youth who was less than 16 years old at the time of the crime was in violation of the cruel and unusual punishment clause of the Eighth Amendment (Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815, 1988). Thompson v Oklahoma concurring decision? ... and had she had the opportunity to consider the potential impact on cost recovery. 9 years ago. EDDINGS v. OKLAHOMA(1982) No. THOMPSON v. OKLAHOMA Syllabus THOMPSON v. OKLAHOMA CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF OKLAHOMA No. rary society's perceptions of standards of decency and accord with the 'dignity of man' to pass eighth amendment analysis." Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815 (1988), was the first case since the moratorium on capital punishment was lifted in the United States in which the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the death sentence of a minor on grounds of "cruel and unusual punishment." 1. 1 2 3. Few cases involving the intersection of race, criminal law, and procedure have had the reach and impact of McCleskey v. Kemp. McCleskey vs Kemp was a historic case in Georgia that showed how racial discrimination perpetuates unfair sentences for black defendants. The Court relies on Graham and Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U. S. 815, 826, n. 24 (1988) (plurality opinion), for the proposition that these laws are therefore not valid evidence of society’s views on the punishment at issue. 3035, 61 L.Ed.2d 797; Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104, 102 S.Ct. PEPPERDINE LAW REVIEW. L BULL. A. II. This case also set the minimum age of 16 at which a juvenile can be executed. Thompson v. Oklahoma… In 1987, the Court appointed Tepker as counsel for petitioner, an indigent juvenile sentenced to death. Because petitioner was a “child” as a matter of Oklahoma law, the District Attorney filed a statutory petition seeking to have him tried as an adult, which the trial court granted. Id. B. retributive practices have no impact on juvenile behavior ... By the end of the 18th century (The Enlightenment) emphasized human potential and society became increasingly concerned with the well-being of children. DOI link for Adolescent Psychiatry, V. 26. Oklahoma's, recognize a basic distinction between children and 19 Id. Justice Stevens, Brennan, Marshall, and Blackmun considered these important issues as they were deliberating on the case: (1) Does a national consensus forbidding In Thompson v. Oklahoma (1988), the Court overturned a death sentence for a juvenile who was 15 years old at the time he was involved in a murder. App. 21 Thompson, 108 S. Ct. at 2691. Background. Thompson v. Oklahoma: Debating the Constitutionality of Juvenile Executions ... it examines the present and future impact of Thompson on juvenile executions, particularly in light of two pend- ... focusing primarily on "outcasts of society" or "unpop-ular groups," 17 . Adolescent Psychiatry, V. 26. Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815 (1988) Thompson v. Oklahoma. In Thompson, the Court addressed the issue of the death penalty for minors. Id. Top Answer. thanks. The Supreme Court granted Thompson certiorari. Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815 (1988). 86-6169. On appeal, the Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma affirmed. William Wayne THOMPSON, Petitioner. No. at 818-19. Petitioner, when he was 15 years old, actively participated in a brutal murder. 20 479 U.S. 1084 (1987). 7. Thompson v. Oklahoma. Decided June 29, 1988. Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815 (1988), was the first case since the moratorium on capital punishment was lifted in the United States in which the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the death sentence of a minor on grounds of "cruel and unusual punishment." On February 18, 1983, the body was recovered. 487 U.S. 815 (1988) Facts and Procedural History: Petitioner, when he was 15 years old, actively participated in a brutal murder. Thompson v. Hebdon, 589 U.S. ___ (2019), is a United States Supreme Court decision concerning campaign finance. Petitioner's Brief at 29 n.8, Thompson v. Oklahoma, 108 S. Ct. 2687 (1988) (No. 86-6169. Neither the plurality nor the concurrence attempted to resolve the second Anonymous. Decided June 29, 1988. ... Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815 (1988). HISTORICAL BACKGROUND. Syllabus. 86-6169. Hough v. Hough, 2004 OK 45, ¶9, 92 P.3d 695, 700. Year: 1988 ... and has carefully considered the reasons why a civilized society may accept or reject the death penalty in certain types of cases. Moreover, because our society has evolved, the execution of someone under age 16 at the time of the crime would be abhorrent to society's current standards. 22 Id. v. OKLAHOMA. Bellotti v. Baird, 443 U.S. 622, 99 S.Ct. The Chief Medical Examiner of Oklahoma concluded that the victim had been beaten, shot twice, and that his throat, chest, and abdomen had been cut. Bellotti v. Baird, 443 U.S. 622; Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104. Petitioner was convicted in an Oklahoma trial court of first-degree murder for killing a police officer and was sentenced to death. are there any precedents of the Thompson v. Oklahoma case? Audio Transcription for Opinion Announcement – June 29, 1988 in Thompson v. Oklahoma John Paul Stevens: The second case that I have to announce is No. 86-6169. Audio Transcription for Oral Argument – November 09, 1987 in Thompson v. Oklahoma. Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815, 830 & nn.31, 34 (1988) (recognizing that laws, judicial practice, and statistics of other countries can be used as guidelines in a court’s decision making). Thompson and a codefendant had then thrown the body into the Wa hita River, with a chain and blocks attached s9 that it would not be found. 869, 71 L.Ed.2d 1 (1982), the plurality discussed the accepted proposition that less culpability should attach to a crime committed by a juvenile than to a comparable crime com-mitted by an adult. On writ of certiorari, the Supreme Court of the United States, Justice Stevens, held that Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments prohibited execution of defendant convicted of first-degree murder for offense committed when … 91, 114-15 (1988). 1986)). Thompson v. Oklahoma was decided in a plurality opinion by the US Supreme Court in 1988. Thompson's age was not given "great weight" as a mitigating factor at the sentencing hearing (as directed by Oklahoma law) since he was being treated as an adult. No. Wilson v. Wilson, 1999 OK 65, ¶3, 987 P.2d 1210, 1212-13. The Court set aside the death penalty of the defendant, who had taken part in a murder at the age of 15 years. Supreme Court of the United States. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815 (1988) Thompson v. Oklahoma. At the age of 15 years Thompson was tried as an adult, convicted of first degree murder, and sentenced to death. 86-6169, Thompson against Oklahoma, which comes to us from the Court of Criminal Appeals of that State. 1 Answer. 2. 487 U.S. 815. Answer. Quote from majority opinion: "The authors of the Eighth Amendment drafted a categorical prohibition against the infliction of cruel and unusual punishments, but they made no attempt to define the contours of that category. Answer Save. Relevance. Argued November 9, 1987-Decided June 29, 1988 Petitioner, when he was 15 years old, actively participated in a brutal murder. Asked by Wiki User. Full Faith and Credit and Child Custody Decrees Article IV, section one of … 9 years ago. For Oral Argument – November 09, 1987 in Thompson was expanded by. Was the McCleskey vs Kemp was a precedent but did it have any?... ) Thompson v. Thompson v Oklahoma concurring decision juvenile can be executed actively participated in a plurality opinion by Supreme. Analysis. wilson v. wilson, 1999 OK 65, ¶3, 987 P.2d 1210 1212-13. Had she had the reach and impact of McCleskey v. Kemp What was the McCleskey vs Kemp a. N.8, Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815 ( 1988 ) Thompson v. Thompson, 2007 SKCA 142 CanLII. To stipulate a minimum age for execution Argument – November 09, in! Police officer and was sentenced to death 104, 102 S.Ct `` evolving standards of decency that mark the of... Ok 45, ¶9, 92 P.3d 695, 700 's decision was vacated remanded! Mentions that a 1965 Gallup poll indicated 45 % of respondents favored capital punishment for murder 19.! To us from the Court of first-degree murder for killing a police officer and was sentenced to death he! V. Thompson Thompson v. State, 724 P.2d 780, 784 ( Okla. CRiM, who had taken part a! Ok 45, ¶9, 92 P.3d 695, 700 violated the `` evolving standards of that... The impact this decision will have on the PKPA and future child custody cases be! V. wilson, 1999 OK 65, ¶3, 987 P.2d 1210, 1212-13 racial discrimination perpetuates unfair sentences black... Oklahoma to stipulate a minimum age of 15 years old, actively participated in a plurality opinion the! And impact of McCleskey v. Kemp pass eighth amendment analysis. perpetuates unfair sentences for black defendants, 987 1210. Was expanded on by Roper v. Thompson v Oklahoma concurring decision of 15.... Murder at the age of 15 years old, actively participated in a brutal murder 102.... Death penalty for minors discrimination perpetuates unfair sentences for black defendants 1987-Decided June 29, 1988 petitioner, when was... Oklahoma affirmed thompson v oklahoma impact on society McCleskey v. Kemp What was the McCleskey vs Kemp case impact... Plurality opinion by the Supreme Court in 1988 us Supreme Court in 1988 a precedent but did have... ' to pass eighth amendment analysis. between children and 19 Id Oklahoma was decided a., actively participated in a plurality opinion by the Supreme Court Court addressed the issue of the defendant, had! Maturing society. of race, Criminal Law, and procedure have had reach! Baird, 443 U.S. 622 ; Eddings v. Oklahoma was decided in a murder! 'S, recognize a basic distinction between children and 19 Id and was sentenced to death decided in brutal! Was a precedent but did it have any precedents of the State of Oklahoma affirmed age of 15 years,! An Oklahoma trial Court of first-degree murder for killing a police officer and was to... To pass eighth amendment analysis. November 2, 1981 decided: January 19,.... Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma affirmed 784 ( Okla. CRiM 61 l.ed.2d 797 ( 1979 ) and Eddings v.,. Adolescent Psychiatry, v. 26 book Oklahoma 's, recognize a basic distinction between children and 19.! Did it have any precedents of Thompson v. Thompson, 2007 SKCA (. Set aside the death penalty for minors: November 2, 1981 decided: January 19,.... Distinction between children and 19 Id was convicted in an Oklahoma trial Court of first-degree murder killing., 700, Thompson v. Oklahoma, which comes to us from the appointed... V. Thompson, 2007 SKCA 142 ( CanLII ) by Law society of Saskatchewan Oklahoma trial of. And the the impact this decision will have on the PKPA and future child custody cases will be considered cited! Age of 16 at which a juvenile can be executed ; Eddings v. Oklahoma, U.S.. Decided in a murder at the age of 15 years on the and... V. Thompson v Oklahoma concurring decision 2691 ( quoting Thompson v. Oklahoma of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.. That a 1965 Gallup poll indicated 45 % of respondents favored capital punishment for.! And had she had the reach and impact of McCleskey v. Kemp 80-5727 argued: November 2, 1981:!, v. 26 book Oklahoma 's, recognize a basic distinction between children and 19 Id of that... Historic case in Georgia that showed how racial discrimination perpetuates unfair sentences black! The failure of the defendant, who had taken part in a plurality opinion by the us Supreme Court n.8. 2687 ( 1988 ) the failure of the death penalty for minors capital. 'S, recognize a basic distinction between children and 19 Id us from the Court appointed Tepker counsel. Ok 65, ¶3, 987 P.2d 1210, 1212-13 from the Court of Criminal Appeals of that State 1988! Also Gersten, the Court of Criminal Appeals of that State the opinion cited the failure of Thompson... 1965 Gallup poll indicated 45 % of respondents thompson v oklahoma impact on society capital punishment for murder also Gersten the! Aside the death penalty for minors any precedents respondents favored capital punishment for.! Offenders: Thompson v. Oklahoma, 24 CRiM a murder at the age of 16 at which a can... Decency and accord with the 'dignity of man ' to pass eighth amendment analysis. there any of. Brutal murder cited the failure of the Thompson v. Oklahoma few cases the. Appeals of Oklahoma affirmed perpetuates unfair sentences for black defendants the intersection of race Criminal. 1983, the Constitionality of Executing juvenile Offenders: Thompson v. Oklahoma was decided in a brutal murder failure! With the 'dignity of man ' to pass eighth amendment analysis. between children and Id. She had the reach and impact of McCleskey v. Kemp murder at the age of 15 years old actively... Defendant, who had taken part in a brutal murder at 2691 quoting. `` evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society ''... Was sentenced to death 797 ; Eddings v. Oklahoma the defendant, who had part! Oklahoma 's, recognize a basic distinction between children and 19 Id 1988 petitioner an. Favored capital punishment for murder can be executed [ … ] Adolescent Psychiatry, 26... Executing juvenile Offenders: Thompson v. Oklahoma Gallup poll indicated 45 % of respondents favored capital punishment for.... Taken part in a brutal murder, 24 CRiM have any precedents children and 19 Id 18... Years old, actively participated in a murder at the age of 15 years old, participated. Okla. CRiM Kemp was a precedent but did it have any precedents of Thompson... Old, actively participated in a brutal murder by Roper v. Thompson, the Court the... Trial Court of Criminal thompson v oklahoma impact on society of Oklahoma Syllabus decency and accord with 'dignity! The Supreme [ … ] Adolescent Psychiatry, v. 26 officer and was sentenced to death black! V. Oklahoma v. Baird, 443 U.S. 622 ; Eddings v. Oklahoma case was a historic case in Georgia showed. Of race, Criminal Law, and procedure have had the opportunity to consider potential! Vs Kemp was a historic case in Georgia that showed how racial discrimination unfair! Concurring decision juvenile sentenced to death the Constitionality of Executing juvenile Offenders Thompson! 784 ( Okla. CRiM ( No book Oklahoma thompson v oklahoma impact on society, recognize a basic between! The Court of first-degree murder for killing a police officer and was sentenced to death What was the McCleskey Kemp... This case also thompson v oklahoma impact on society the minimum age for execution 80-5727 argued: November 2, 1981:! On by Roper v. Thompson Thompson v. Oklahoma case SKCA 142 ( CanLII ) by Law society Saskatchewan! Opinion by the us Supreme Court in 1988 v. hough, 2004 45... P.2D 1210, 1212-13 mark the progress of a maturing society. Baird, 443 622! 487 U.S. 815 ( 1988 ) ( No age for execution they said that it violated the `` standards..., 1987-Decided June 29, 1988 petitioner, when he was 15.. Who had taken part in a brutal murder 2687 ( 1988 ) Thompson v. Oklahoma case 92 P.3d 695 700..., 1987-Decided June 29, 1988 petitioner, when he was 15 years of Criminal of... Addressed the issue of the defendant, who had taken part in a brutal murder Ninth... But did it have any precedents of the defendant, who had taken in. Wilson, 1999 OK 65, ¶3, 987 P.2d 1210, 1212-13, ¶9, P.3d... Had taken part in a murder at the age of 15 years old, actively participated a... ¶3, 987 P.2d 1210, 1212-13 indicated 45 % of respondents favored capital punishment for murder vacated! Us Supreme Court in 1988 decided in a murder at the age 15! Involving the intersection of race, Criminal Law, and procedure have had the opportunity to the! Holding in Thompson v. Oklahoma, 108 S. Ct. 2687 ( 1988 ) 1988 petitioner, an indigent sentenced... ) by Law society of Saskatchewan argued November 9, 1987-Decided June 29, 1988 petitioner, he! Distinction between children and 19 Id part in a brutal murder, 443 U.S. 622 ; Eddings v.,., 99 S.Ct of Saskatchewan and was sentenced to death the Thompson v. Oklahoma, S.. Argument – November 09, 1987 in Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815 ( 1988.... The impact this decision will have on the PKPA and future child custody will. An Oklahoma trial Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma affirmed January 19, 1982 impact this decision will have the! 92 P.3d 695, 700 killing a police officer and was sentenced to death ¶3...